Industry News
OOIDA National Call to Action Alert
The Owner Operators Independent Drivers Association calls on members to contact their U S Senators and Representatives to pass theTRUCC Act.
OOIDA Sent the following email to all members on 6/26/2008
As you know, a Congressman and two Senators were elected to represent you, your family, your hometown and your state in Washington, DC.
If you are receiving this email, it means that at least 2 of those 3 lawmakers on Capitol Hill have not yet committed to supporting the TRUCC Act by signing on as cosponsors of the House or Senate versions of the bill. For some of you, all 3 of your elected representatives have yet to get on board.
H.R.5977 (House) and S.2910 (Senate) will require that 100 percent of fuel surcharges levied on a shipper be passed through to whoever actually pays for the fuel to haul that shipper's goods, obviously in most cases that's a trucker.
Both bills share the same title - "Trust in Reliable Understanding of Consumer Costs Act" or "TRUCC Act" and both will ensure that middlemen will no longer be able to skim or pocket fuel surcharges that should be going to truckers. Click here to view the bills.
OOIDA has been working hard to move the TRUCC Act forward in the legislative process, but for the Congressional leadership to take the bill seriously, they also need to see that it has the support of several Congressmen and Senators.
Please call the offices of both of your Senators and your Congressman to ask them to commit their support for the TRUCC Act by signing on as 'cosponsors' of the bill.
To contact your 2 Senators and your Representative in the House, call the U.S. Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121, provide the operator with your home zip code. The operator will connect you with the offices of your elected representatives.
You are also welcome to call OOIDA at (800) 444-5791. Association staff will be happy to help put you in touch with your elected officials in Washington.
----------------------------------------------
HOUSE - SAMPLE MESSAGE:
"I am from and I strongly support the TRUCC Act. As my elected representative, I ask that the Congressman/Congresswoman commit to helping truckers by cosponsoring H.R.5977. "
SENATE - SAMPLE MESSAGE:
"I am from and I strongly support the TRUCC Act. As my elected representative, I ask that the Senator commit to helping truckers by cosponsoring S.2910. "
----------------------------------------------
Remember, taking a few minutes to make phone calls to your elected representatives can make a major difference in how those individuals understand and view issues affecting you and your livelihood.
If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call the Association at 1-800-444-5791.
TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD.
TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE CAPITOL HILL TAKE NOTICE.
TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE LIFE BETTER FOR TRUCKERS THROUGHOUT AMERICA
-------------------------------
You can also help your voice be even stronger in Washington by contributing to the OOIDA Political Action Committee.
100% of OOIDA PAC money goes towards contributions to elected officials who listen to and act upon the concerns of small business truckers and professional drivers.
For further information on the OOIDA PAC, please contact the Membership Department at 1-800-444-5791.
HR 5977 SUMMARY
5/6/2008--Introduced.
Trust in Reliable Understanding of Consumer Costs Act or the TRUCC Act - Amends federal transportation law to require certain fuel costs disclosures and fuel costs reimbursements by a motor carrier, broker, or freight forwarder providing or arranging transportation or service using fuel for which it does not bear the cost.
Requires such a motor carrier, broker, or freight forwarder to: (1) reimburse persons (truckers) that do bear fuel costs for any such costs they have paid; and (2) give such persons a written list that identifies any freight charge, brokerage fee or commission, fuel surcharge or adjustment, and any other charges.
Prohibits any person from causing a motor carrier, broker, or freight forwarder to present false or misleading information on a document or in an oral representation about the actual rate, charge, or allowance to any party to the transaction or transportation.
HR 5977 FULL TEXT
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-5977
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mexican Trucks to run in US
By John Crawley Sat Sep 1, 11:44 AM ET
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration can proceed with a plan to open the U.S. border to long haul Mexican trucks as early as next week after an appeals court rejected a bid by labor, consumer and environmental interests to block the initiative.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco late on Friday denied an emergency petition sought by the Teamsters union, the Sierra Club and consumer group Public Citizen to halt the start of a one-year pilot program that was approved by Congress after years of legal and political wrangling.
The Transportation Department welcomed the decision and said in a statement that allowing more direct shipments from Mexico will benefit U.S. consumers.
The 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement approved broader access for ground shipments from both countries but the Clinton administration never complied with the trucking provision. A special tribunal ordered the Bush administration to do so in 2001.
"This is the wrong decision for working men and women," Jim Hoffa, president of the Teamsters, said in a statement after the court ruling. "We believe this program clearly breaks the law." The Teamsters represents truckers that would be affected by the change.
The emergency stay was sought on grounds the administration's pilot program had not satisfied the U.S. Congress' requirements on safety and other issues. But the appeals court ruled otherwise.
SAFETY ASPECTS
The administration plans to start the program on September 6. Transportation Department officials hope to receive final clearance early next week from the department's inspector general's office, which is reviewing its safety aspects, and finalize details with Mexican authorities.
The Mexican government must grant reciprocal access to U.S. trucks under NAFTA. That provision is not expected to be a problem, regulators said.
Mexican trucks operating in the United States have for years been restricted to U.S. points near certain large border crossings where their goods are transferred to trucks owned by U.S. firms.
Under the pilot program, Mexican long haul trucking companies that have met safety, licensing, and other U.S. requirements will be allowed to operate their rigs throughout the country. Proponents say this will reduce costs and speed up shipments.
Trucking regulators said in a court filing the goal is to gradually accommodate 100 Mexican trucking companies by the end of the pilot program, or roughly 540 large trucks.
But opponents said those figures do not reflect the number of companies that could seek access to U.S. roads if the pilot is successful, which they said raises safety concerns.
"This (pilot) program is basically a show trial. They haven't provided notice up front about who will participate. You just don't know what the program will look like," said Bonnie Robin-Vergeer, attorney for Public Citizen.
Public Citizen and the Teamsters still plan to proceed with a lawsuit they filed in federal court, challenging the Mexican truck program on broader grounds. That case will not likely be decided until next year.
Trucks from Canada have no operating restrictions in the United States.
(Reporting by John Crawley)
Updated: 8/17/2007 4:50:00 PM
DOT Sets Conditions on Mexican Trucks Program

Have you seen one of these lately?
The Department of Transportation said that Mexican trucks will be allowed to operate throughout the United States under its pilot program as long as U.S. trucking companies have equal access south of the border, Bloomberg reported Friday.
The announcement, published in Friday’s Federal Register, means that DOT is ready to resume the pilot program that was blocked by Congress last month, Bloomberg said.
Under the program — which is being reviewed by DOT’s inspector general at Congress’ request — a limited number of trucks and trucking companies that operate in the current U.S. border zone would be given wider access to the United States, DOT said.
Congress has demanded equal access to Mexico for U.S. trucking companies, and the Federal Register notice by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration said the project “will not commence until such reciprocity is provided.” FMCSA is part of DOT.
In a statement, the Teamsters union slammed the DOT move.
“It’s outrageous that the Bush administration would announce on a Friday during Congress’ August recess that it plans to recklessly move forward with its hugely unpopular program to throw open our border to unsafe Mexican trucks,” said Teamsters President Jim Hoffa.
The House voted July 24 to block the Bush administration’s planned pilot program, limiting visiting trucks to the current border-area zone in part due to safety concerns.
The plan also has been criticized by labor and safety groups, and in May the House voted 411-3 to impose more restrictions on DOT’s plans to grant Mexican trucks access to U.S. highways.
By Transport Topics
INVASION USA It's official: Mexican trucks coming
100 companies will have unlimited access to U.S. roads

________________________________________
Posted: February 23, 2007
2:41 p.m. Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
(TTNews.com)
One hundred Mexican trucking companies will have unlimited access to U.S. roads to haul international cargo as part of a year-long pilot program, the Department of Transportation announced today
In return, 100 U.S. trucking companies will be allowed to operate in Mexico but at a later date.
Calling for congressional hearings, Teamsters General President Jimmy Hoffa compared the announcement to the "Dubai Ports debacle," charging President Bush is "playing a game of Russian roulette on America's highways."
As WND previously reported, the Teamsters Union has strongly protested the opening up of U.S. highways to Mexican trucks, citing safety concerns.
(Story continues below)
A spokesman for Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., chairman of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing and Urban Development and Related Agencies, told WND the senator plans to hold hearings March 8 on the DOT pilot program.
A statement from Murray's office said she wants "to find out if the administration has really met the safety requirements that the law and the American people demand before long-haul Mexican trucks can travel across all our highways."
A spokeman from the office of Rep. James Oberstar, D-Minn., chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, told WND hearings will most likely be held by Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, chaired by Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore.
Both Oberstar and DeFazio are traveling today and a spokesman from Oberstar's office said the lawmakers have not had a chance yet to confer, so no hearings have yet been scheduled.
Oberstar and DeFazio have posted statements on the homepage of the House Transportation and Infrastructure raising questions about DOT's proposed Mexican truck pilot program.
Todd Spencer, spokesman for the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, told WND that "to reach a conclusion that the safety regime in Mexico is compatible in any way, shape, or form with what we have here in the U.S. is ignoring reality. Mexico has never had hours-in-service regulations or drug testing of drivers. We still can't verify the accuracy of somebody's Commercial Driver’s License in Mexico for safety or compliance."
Spencer stressed the decision is not just a border decision.
"Once Mexican trucks are in the United States on this pilot program, they can operate everywhere in the U.S.," Spencer told WND. "If some state highway policeman in Vermont or Iowa stops a Mexican commercial truck in their state, they have absolutely no idea of deciding if that vehicle is in compliance with federal safety requirements. Who's going to provide the training or the equipment for state police to verify the legality of a commercial truck from Mexico, in terms of its cargo, its haul, its log book, or even the driver? Local police aren't going to have a clue."
Hoffa cited Mexico's inability to satisfy the DOT Inspector General's requirements for safety that have been mandated to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, or FMCSA.
WND previously reported applications of some 678 Mexican motor carriers seeking long-haul authority to operate about 4,000 vehicles was being held up pending the completed DOT Inspector General's review of proposed FMCSA rules regarding safety reviews for Mexican trucks seeking to operate in the U.S., including rules for on-site safety inspections in Mexico.
The DOT spokesman also affirmed to WND the FMCSA has now drafted regulations that the DOT Inspector General has accepted, after an audit of the enforcement mechanisms and regulations the FMCSA created.
The Teamsters Union posed to WND a series of "unanswered questions," including:
• Will the drivers be checked against the terror watch list, or will our borders be open to anyone with a Mexican driver's license?
• Will the drivers be required to carry a Mexican passport as U.S. citizens are required to present their passports when entering the country from Mexico?
• Will all U.S. standards be applied to Mexican drivers, including the requirement that U.S. drivers undergo regular physicals and meet minimum age requirements?
• Will Mexican truck drivers participating in the pilot program be required to undergo drug and alcohol testing in U.S. labs? Who will oversee the collection of random samples for drug and alcohol testing of the Mexican drivers while they are in the U.S.?
• Will U.S. wage and hour laws be enforced for Mexican drivers during the pilot program? How will DOT enforce hours of service rules and prevent false log books and fatigued drivers from entering the U.S.?
• How can DOT assure the U.S. public that all trucks will be inspected by U.S. officials in Mexico and at the U.S. border when fewer that 10 percent of all Mexican trucks entering the commercial zone are inspected today?
According to a DOT spokesman, the pilot program "is predicated on the notion that Mexican trucks operating in the U.S. under the pilot program will operate pursuant to every single requirement that pertains to U.S. trucks operating in the United States, including both safety and security requirements on both the state and federal level."
DOT has increased its inspection staff by some 270 inspectors to implement the program. Still, DOT plans to continue the on-site inspection activities in Mexico that were announced by DOT Secretary Mary Peters earlier this week in Monterrey, Mexico.
The DOT spokesman confirmed there is no limit to the number of trucks the 100 Mexican trucking companies can operate in the United States. There is no restriction on the roads within the United States that the Mexican trucks can travel once they are admitted in the pilot program at the border.
The Mexican trucks, however, will be limited to carrying international cargo, in that they will be prohibited from stopping at one point in the U.S. destined for another point within the country.
On their return home, Mexican trucks, however, will be allowed to pick up in U.S. cargo originating in the U.S. destined for delivery back to Mexico.
While in the U.S., the Mexican drivers will operate under U.S. rules and regulations, including those controlling hours of time allowed at the wheel without a break.
The DOT spokesman specified that under agreements with Mexico already in effect, Mexican and U.S. commercial driver's licenses will be consider equivalent during the pilot program.
Mexican trucks operating in the United States will be required to have U.S. insurance coverage for all liabilities, including traffic accidents.
"The intent is for the Mexican trucking operations in the U.S. to be indistinguishable from U.S. trucking operations," the DOT spokesperson affirmed, "except that the driver and the truck began their trip in Mexico."
________________________________________
OOIDA tells Senate committee NAFTA pilot plan unsafe
WASHINGTON (March 8, 2007) — A small business trucker testifying on behalf of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) told a U.S. Senate committee that small business truckers oppose DOT’s pilot program to qualify 100 Mexican truckers to travel deeper into the U.S.
Charlie Parfrey, who has spent 10 years on the road and 23 years in the trucking industry, named safety and security concerns, including driver verification, drug and alcohol testing, insurance and Hours of Service, among other things.
The testimony was before a U.S. Senate committee that is considering DOT’s year-long pilot program to allow 100 qualifying Mexican trucks beyond the narrow trade routes now in place along the border.
Todd Spencer, executive vice president of OOIDA, said the pilot plan is ignoring homeland security concerns.
“It is simply abhorrent to think that our government would allow Mexican trucks full access to U.S. highways before all safety, economic and homeland security concerns are completely and appropriately addressed,” Spencer said.
He said DOT is “bending over backwards to accommodate Mexican motor carriers” and “Yet on matters that would significantly help hundreds of thousands of American truckers and advance safety on our nation’s highways, we often hear from DOT officials that the department has limited resources and staff.”
Spencer said the pilot program is “not in the best interest of the American public.”
— The Trucker News Services
Preliminary figures show truck fatalities down
By Jill Dunn
Preliminary figures indicate large truck fatalities decreased in 2005 from the previous year, but were up from 2003,
according to a new Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Progress Report.
All the 2005 figures in the safety outcomes category were preliminary. Large truck fatalities were 5,036 in 2003, 5,235
in 2004 and 5,212 in 2005. The large truck fatality rate per 100 million truck vehicle miles was 2.31 in 2003, 2.37 in 2004
and 2.34 in 2005.
However, total large truck injuries dropped during those two years, from 122,000 to 114,000.
The 2005 figures in the rest of the report were not preliminary and showed general improvement in data quality and beefed-
up enforcement. The number of roadside truck inspections increased since from 2,949,558 in 2003 to 3,133,102 in 2005.
The complete report is online at www.fmcsa.dot.gov.
2005 National Large Truck Crash Facts
4,932 Large Trucks Involved in Fatal Crashes
5,212 Fatalities in Crashes Involving Large Trucks
139,772 Large Trucks Involved in Non-Fatal Crashes
60,617 Large Trucks Involved in Injury Crashes
91,824 Injuries in Crashes Involving Large Trucks
79,155 Large Trucks Involved in Towaway Crashes
2,371 Large Trucks Involved in Hazmat (HM) Placard
Crashes
Click Here to view
Fatality Facts for 2005
The Iteris Lane Departure Warning (LDW) System
Proven Safety Technology, The Iteris LDW system prevents costly accidents and saves lives — Available OEM from
Freightliner and aftermarket on any Class 8 truck, the Iteris LDW system has been proven to reduce lane departure
accidents by up to 90% by fleets that have accumulated hundreds of millions of miles. In a recently released FMCSA study,
Lane and Roadway Departures were cited as the leading cause of crashes when the truck was found to be at fault.
Lane Departure Warning (LDW)
Many accidents today are caused by inadvertent lane changes due to drowsiness, fatigue and distraction.
| | Latest Statistics: Highway Fatalities |
| 42,643 | Total Fatalities in 2003 |
| 23,324 | Lane Departure Fatalities in 2003 |
| 59% | Lane Departure Fatalities in 2003 (Percent of total fatalities as a direct result of unintended lane departure accidents.) |
Source: safety.fhwa.dot.gov/facts/road_factsheet.htm
The Lane Departure Warning (LDW) System from Iteris is designed to prevent inadvertent lane change and roadway departure accidents due to drowsiness, fatigue or distraction. LDW provides a second set of eyes that are ALWAYS attentive and ALWAYS on the road.
What is LDW?
LDW uses a technology called Machine Vision to track a vehicles position relative to the lane markings. Using image recognition software, the system can detect when a vehicle drifts towards an unintended lane change. When this occurs, the unit automatically emits a distinctive rumble strip sound from the left or right speaker (depending on which way the vehicle is drifting), alerting the driver to make a correction.
LDW works effectively both day and night and in most weather conditions where lane markings are visible. LDW is capable of detecting both solid and dashed lines even if the lines are heavily faded.
"Virtual" rumble strips
U.S. Government accident statistics, collected for over 20 years, show that highway rumble strips, where installed, have proven to effectively reduce run-off-road accidents by 30 - 70%. LDW warns drivers before they hit the rumble strip.
LDW provides all the functionality of highway rumble strips, electronically, everywhere there are lane markings. LDW works on the shoulder, centerline and between lanes.
| | Lane Departure Warning Features & Benefits |
| YES | Promotes use of turn signals when changing lanes |
| YES | Conditions drivers to have a keen sense of "lane position awareness" |
| YES | Emits no warning for planned lane departures (with turn signals on) |
| YES | Zero maintenance with functioning wipers and clean windshield |
| YES | Disabled below 37 mph (design for highway travel) |
| YES | Designed for 10-12 year life |
| YES | OEM available through Freightliner, Mercedes, and MAN |
| YES | Can be installed on most power units |
| YES | Many truck drivers report that it is an effective aid in rain, sleet, fog and general low visibility conditions. |
| YES | False warnings are near zero |
| YES | Can warn drivers of impending fatigue before it becomes a problem |
Americans commute longer, farther than ever
By Ellen Wulfhorst | April 20, 2006
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Dave Givens drives 370 miles
to work and back every day and considers his seven-hour commute the best answer to balancing his work with his
personal life.The winner of a nationwide contest to find the commuter with the longest trek, Givens is one of millions
of people who are commuting longer and farther than ever before.
Studies show Americans spend more time than ever commuting and for a growing number, getting to work takes more
than an hour. In the most recent U.S. Census Bureau study, 2.8 million people have so-called extreme commutes,
topping 90 minutes.Givens, a 46-year-old electrical engineer, has an extreme commute between home in Mariposa,
California, and his job in San Jose. He leaves home before dawn and returns after dark.His trip landed him first place
among almost 3,000 entries in the search for America's longest commute, sponsored by automotive services provider
Midas Inc. and announced last week. But as harrowing or tedious as Givens' trip may sound, he says it's the way to
keep the home and job he loves."I have the balance right now," Givens told Reuters. "I could do similar jobs closer,
but not with the work reward and job satisfaction I have. And I could live closer, but I wouldn't have the lifestyle that I
desire."To me, this is not that long a commute," he added. "It's just something I do to go to work."
SUBURB-TO-SUBURB COMMUTING
Longer commutes frequently involve people who live in one suburb and work in another, said Alan Pisarski, author of
"Commuting in America."Such a pattern tends to begin with companies moving out of a city to a suburb, enticing workers
to move to less-expensive outer suburbs, he told Reuters. "People see this as an opportunity to go farther away," he said.
Such a move may provide more affordable housing or better schools. Even high fuel costs -- Givens spends about $185 a
week on gasoline -- can pay off in a better quality of life, Pisarski said.
Doreen DeJesus rides a bus from her home in Tobyhanna, Pennsylvania, across New Jersey to her job in Manhattan.
The payoff is a house in the country, she said."It's a matter of getting away from the hustle and bustle of the city," said DeJesus,
37. "It's not an easy thing, but most days it's really worth it."My boss thinks I'm nuts," she added.
Studies show 7.6 percent of U.S. commuters traveled more than an hour to work in 2004, the most recent data available, up
from 6 percent in 1990. The average one-way commute grew by 13 percent to 25.5 minutes between 1990 and 2000.In 1990, only in
New York state did more than 10 percent of workers spend more than an hour to get to work, Pisarski said. Now that situation
can be found in New Jersey, Maryland, Illinois and California as well, he said.
CONGESTION WORSENS
Added to long commutes is increased congestion, according to the Texas Transportation Institute's 2005 Urban Mobility Report.
Commuters typically spent 47 hours a year in traffic jams, up from 40 hours a decade earlier, the study showed.
"That's the time wasted above and beyond just being able to make the trip," said David Schrank, co-author of the report.
But the trips can be worthwhile, said Kay Phillips who works in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 164 miles from her home in Granite
Falls."I really love what I do, so I don't mind," she said.
While Givens spends much of his commute listening to the radio, especially traffic reports, Philips, 52, uses her five-hour commute in
her own way -- she prays."I say a long prayer starting out every morning for everybody, and it gives you quite a bit of time to do that,"
she said.
MADD pushing new technology to eliminate drunken driving
By ANN SANNER (Associated Press Writer)
Associated Press
November 20, 2006
WASHINGTON - New technology such as alcohol-detecting devices in cars may hold the key to eliminating drunken driving, according
to a campaign begun Monday by Mothers Against Drunk Driving.The organization, along with the Department of Transportation, is pushing
for such devices as well as tougher enforcement measures around the country."If we can't stop drunks from driving, we'll stop vehicles from
driving drunks," said Glynn Birch, president of MADD, at a news conference. Birch said technology, along with tougher laws and enforcement,
has put eliminating drunken driving "at our fingertips."
The organization wants states to pass laws requiring breath-test interlock devices in vehicles for all those who have been convicted of drunken
driving. New Mexico has such a law for first offenders; 45 states and the District of Columbia allow the device for some offenders.Interlock
devices require drivers to blow into an instrument that measures alcohol. The vehicle won't start unless the driver's blood alcohol concentration is
below a preset level. Other interlocks may require drivers to breathe into the devices periodically."The main reason people continue to drive
drunk today is because they can and because we let them," Birch said.
MADD estimates that 1,900 lives could be saved each year if interlocks were installed in the vehicles of all convicted drunken drivers.
The American Beverage Institute, which represents restaurants, says MADD's campaign is overreaching.
"Our general position is that the interlock campaign is not about eliminating drunk driving, it's about eliminating all moderate and responsible
drinking prior to driving and Americans should be outraged by this," said Sarah Longwell, spokeswoman for the association. As part of the MADD campaign, safety experts will explore other technology options. Some alternatives could measure blood alcohol concentration by sampling air in the vehicle or tracking hand or eye movements that might indicate drowsiness or drunken behavior.
"Advanced technology is being developed that in the future may allow quick, accurate and reliable detection of drinking drivers in the time it takes to start a vehicle," said Susan Ferguson, senior vice president of research at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, who will chair the panel.
MADD also wants states to implement more sobriety checkpoints.
The federal government has set aside $7 million for advertising in December to remind drivers that if they are over the legal limit, they can be arrested.
Each year, nearly 13,000 people are killed in accidents involving drivers with blood alcohol concentrations of .08 or above, according to MADD.
Other organizations joining the campaign include the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Distilled Spirits Council and the International Association of Chiefs of Police.
On the Net:
http://www.madd.com
http://www.americanbeverageinstitute.com
Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Poll: Most use phones while driving: 74 percent say restrictions would reduce accidents
by
Brandee Hayhurst
Times-News, Burlington, N.C.
November 18, 2006
Nov. 18--Few North Carolinians refrain from using a cell phone in the car despite the fact that most believe it is dangerous. An Elon University poll found that just 22 percent of North Carolinians don't use a cell phone while driving. And of those who do use cell phones, only 20 percent use a hands-free device. Of the 533 people polled, 74 percent said restricting cell phone use would decrease accidents. Eighty percent said cell phones decrease highway safety and 90 percent said using a cell phone while driving is a distraction. Results had a margin of error of plus or minus 4.3 percent. "Old habits appear tough to break," said Hunter Bacot, director of the Elon University poll. "While a large majority of North Carolinians understand the safety threats and distractions of using a cell phone while driving, a majority of people continue to use cell phones in their cars." Experts with the UNC Highway Safety Research Center have estimated that cell phones are responsible for at least 1,500 car wrecks across the state each year. North Carolina legislators recently decided that it's too dangerous for teenagers to talk and drive. Starting Dec. 1, anyone under the age of 18 will be banned from using a cell phone while driving unless they are calling a parent or spouse, or trying to get help during an emergency. The same Elon poll found that North Carolinians are split on whether they would support toll roads. When asked how the state should pay for road maintenance and construction, 19 percent said with a gas tax, 11 percent said with current taxes and 10 percent said with a car tax. But 14 percent didn't know and 18 percent suggested other ways to pay. Brandee Hayhurst can be reached at brandee_hayhurst@link.freedom.com
-----
Copyright (c) 2006, Times-News, Burlington, N.C.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Business News.
For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.